Place the metaglene component in the optimal position for the patient’s anatomy in record time
Less than 1 mm deviation and 2 degrees accuracy in the position of the metaglene component.
Reestablish the neutral glenoid plane taking as reference the scapular axis of the patient.
Reduce up to 46% of surgical time, all in benefit of your patient.
Get a Detailed Digital Surgery Simulating the perfect position of your prosthesis
Get a detailed measure of recomended reaming distance of the glenoid surface
Have a detailed analysis of the glenoid surface anatomy, including:
– Anteversion or retroversion angle
– Tilt
Get a recommendation on Implant sizes and Screws lengths and directions
Go one step forward with our Patient Specific Central PIN Positioning Guide
Ensure the good positioning of the central pin with our Patient Specific Surgical Guide
Bring your surgery to the next level. Get a full personalised metaglene system perfectly adapted to your patient
Drill all the peripheral screws holes in perfect direction and ensure the correct position of the metaglene with our Patient Specific Surgical Guide.
Avoid adapting the patient to the implant and add a personalized metaglene component perfectly adapted to the glenoid surface of the patient. Compatible with your standar prosthesis.
The Reverse Shoulder Artrhoplasty is indicated for the treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis and proximal humeral fractures.
This product is compatible with the following prothesis:
Other implants coming soon, ask for yours here!
Need more information? Download our case examples:
Marcoin, A., Nerot, C., Lestra, T., Blasco, L., Ferrier, A., Siboni, R. and Ohl, X., 2020. The precision of patient-specific instrumentation guides for the positioning of the glenoid component in total reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo scanographic study. International Orthopaedics, 44(9), pp.1761-1766
Villatte, G., Muller, A., Pereira, B., Mulliez, A., Reilly, P. and Emery, R., 2018. Use of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 13(8), p.e0201759.
Walch, G., Vezeridis, P., Boileau, P., Deransart, P. and Chaoui, J., 2015. Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 24(2), pp.302-309.
Boileau, P., Cheval, D., Gauci, M., Holzer, N., Chaoui, J. and Walch, G., 2018. Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 100(1), pp.57-65.
Srivas, P., Kapat, K., Dadhich, P., Pal, P., Dutta, J., Datta, P. and Dhara, S., 2017. Osseointegration assessment of extrusion printed Ti6Al4V scaffold towards accelerated skeletal defect healing via tissue in-growth. Bioprinting, 6, pp.8-17.
Xiong, Y., Wang, W., Gao, R., Zhang, H., Dong, L., Qin, J., Wang, B., Jia, W. and Li, X., 2020. Fatigue behavior and osseointegration of porous Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds with dense core for dental application. Materials & Design, 195, p.108994.
I have performed a lot of Tailor Surgeries, saving sustancial surgical time. Now I’m dedicating this time to research!